![]() We no longer use carrier pigeon or corked bottles in the ocean to send official communications. ![]() Then what happened?Įmails have been sent and received from Dr. But to add more to this, upon further digging it seems that some of these original photographers photographing the "Grinch" sessions were committing some of their own intellectual property violations. (Yes, that's copyright infringement of that photographer). ![]() The first legal issues that started popping up were other photographers taking and using these photographs to advertise "Grinch" sessions to their potential clients. Recently, a photographer went viral with beautifully done photographs (featured places such as ). Once you've read this blog, it's time to enroll in Legally Cover Your (Social Media) Assets so you don't get a visit from the mean one! What happened? Take this educational information to learn how to have fun with sessions in future without infringing upon another's intellectual property rights. Seuss Enterprises, nor any of the photographers in question. At this time we have not discussed with Dr. This information is from what we have been able to gather from the internet and community groups. As an intellectual property attorney and photographer, this information is my jam. This article is from THE legal resource for photographers (HINT: No one else is a lawyer/photographer and dedicated to bringing you this information). There is major upheaval in the photography community the last few weeks about legal issues surrounding these photographs, the legal rights and what to do now. Super cute cease and desist received? Not so much. The cute Christmas photographs with the mean green guy. So, we've seen it go viral in the photography industry. Portraits - Families, Children & More icon-chevron.Glamour - Sue Bryce Contracts icon-chevron.By Photographer Type icon-chevron Expand submenu.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |